1  ===========================================================================
2                      The UDP-Lite protocol (RFC 3828)
3  ===========================================================================
4
5
6  UDP-Lite is a Standards-Track IETF transport protocol whose characteristic
7  is a variable-length checksum. This has advantages for transport of multimedia
8  (video, VoIP) over wireless networks, as partly damaged packets can still be
9  fed into the codec instead of being discarded due to a failed checksum test.
10
11  This file briefly describes the existing kernel support and the socket API.
12  For in-depth information, you can consult:
13
14   o The UDP-Lite Homepage:
15	http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gerrit/udp-lite/
16       From here you can also download some example application source code.
17
18   o The UDP-Lite HOWTO on
19       http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gerrit/udp-lite/
20	files/UDP-Lite-HOWTO.txt
21
22   o The Wireshark UDP-Lite WiKi (with capture files):
23       https://wiki.wireshark.org/Lightweight_User_Datagram_Protocol
24
25   o The Protocol Spec, RFC 3828, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3828.txt
26
27
28  I) APPLICATIONS
29
30  Several applications have been ported successfully to UDP-Lite. Ethereal
31  (now called wireshark) has UDP-Litev4/v6 support by default.
32  Porting applications to UDP-Lite is straightforward: only socket level and
33  IPPROTO need to be changed; senders additionally set the checksum coverage
34  length (default = header length = 8). Details are in the next section.
35
36
37  II) PROGRAMMING API
38
39  UDP-Lite provides a connectionless, unreliable datagram service and hence
40  uses the same socket type as UDP. In fact, porting from UDP to UDP-Lite is
41  very easy: simply add `IPPROTO_UDPLITE' as the last argument of the socket(2)
42  call so that the statement looks like:
43
44      s = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_UDPLITE);
45
46                      or, respectively,
47
48      s = socket(PF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_UDPLITE);
49
50  With just the above change you are able to run UDP-Lite services or connect
51  to UDP-Lite servers. The kernel will assume that you are not interested in
52  using partial checksum coverage and so emulate UDP mode (full coverage).
53
54  To make use of the partial checksum coverage facilities requires setting a
55  single socket option, which takes an integer specifying the coverage length:
56
57    * Sender checksum coverage: UDPLITE_SEND_CSCOV
58
59      For example,
60
61        int val = 20;
62        setsockopt(s, SOL_UDPLITE, UDPLITE_SEND_CSCOV, &val, sizeof(int));
63
64      sets the checksum coverage length to 20 bytes (12b data + 8b header).
65      Of each packet only the first 20 bytes (plus the pseudo-header) will be
66      checksummed. This is useful for RTP applications which have a 12-byte
67      base header.
68
69
70    * Receiver checksum coverage: UDPLITE_RECV_CSCOV
71
72      This option is the receiver-side analogue. It is truly optional, i.e. not
73      required to enable traffic with partial checksum coverage. Its function is
74      that of a traffic filter: when enabled, it instructs the kernel to drop
75      all packets which have a coverage _less_ than this value. For example, if
76      RTP and UDP headers are to be protected, a receiver can enforce that only
77      packets with a minimum coverage of 20 are admitted:
78
79        int min = 20;
80        setsockopt(s, SOL_UDPLITE, UDPLITE_RECV_CSCOV, &min, sizeof(int));
81
82  The calls to getsockopt(2) are analogous. Being an extension and not a stand-
83  alone protocol, all socket options known from UDP can be used in exactly the
84  same manner as before, e.g. UDP_CORK or UDP_ENCAP.
85
86  A detailed discussion of UDP-Lite checksum coverage options is in section IV.
87
88
89  III) HEADER FILES
90
91  The socket API requires support through header files in /usr/include:
92
93    * /usr/include/netinet/in.h
94        to define IPPROTO_UDPLITE
95
96    * /usr/include/netinet/udplite.h
97        for UDP-Lite header fields and protocol constants
98
99  For testing purposes, the following can serve as a `mini' header file:
100
101    #define IPPROTO_UDPLITE       136
102    #define SOL_UDPLITE           136
103    #define UDPLITE_SEND_CSCOV     10
104    #define UDPLITE_RECV_CSCOV     11
105
106  Ready-made header files for various distros are in the UDP-Lite tarball.
107
108
109  IV) KERNEL BEHAVIOUR WITH REGARD TO THE VARIOUS SOCKET OPTIONS
110
111  To enable debugging messages, the log level need to be set to 8, as most
112  messages use the KERN_DEBUG level (7).
113
114  1) Sender Socket Options
115
116  If the sender specifies a value of 0 as coverage length, the module
117  assumes full coverage, transmits a packet with coverage length of 0
118  and according checksum.  If the sender specifies a coverage < 8 and
119  different from 0, the kernel assumes 8 as default value.  Finally,
120  if the specified coverage length exceeds the packet length, the packet
121  length is used instead as coverage length.
122
123  2) Receiver Socket Options
124
125  The receiver specifies the minimum value of the coverage length it
126  is willing to accept.  A value of 0 here indicates that the receiver
127  always wants the whole of the packet covered. In this case, all
128  partially covered packets are dropped and an error is logged.
129
130  It is not possible to specify illegal values (<0 and <8); in these
131  cases the default of 8 is assumed.
132
133  All packets arriving with a coverage value less than the specified
134  threshold are discarded, these events are also logged.
135
136  3) Disabling the Checksum Computation
137
138  On both sender and receiver, checksumming will always be performed
139  and cannot be disabled using SO_NO_CHECK. Thus
140
141        setsockopt(sockfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_NO_CHECK,  ... );
142
143  will always will be ignored, while the value of
144
145        getsockopt(sockfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_NO_CHECK, &value, ...);
146
147  is meaningless (as in TCP). Packets with a zero checksum field are
148  illegal (cf. RFC 3828, sec. 3.1) and will be silently discarded.
149
150  4) Fragmentation
151
152  The checksum computation respects both buffersize and MTU. The size
153  of UDP-Lite packets is determined by the size of the send buffer. The
154  minimum size of the send buffer is 2048 (defined as SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF
155  in include/net/sock.h), the default value is configurable as
156  net.core.wmem_default or via setting the SO_SNDBUF socket(7)
157  option. The maximum upper bound for the send buffer is determined
158  by net.core.wmem_max.
159
160  Given a payload size larger than the send buffer size, UDP-Lite will
161  split the payload into several individual packets, filling up the
162  send buffer size in each case.
163
164  The precise value also depends on the interface MTU. The interface MTU,
165  in turn, may trigger IP fragmentation. In this case, the generated
166  UDP-Lite packet is split into several IP packets, of which only the
167  first one contains the L4 header.
168
169  The send buffer size has implications on the checksum coverage length.
170  Consider the following example:
171
172  Payload: 1536 bytes          Send Buffer:     1024 bytes
173  MTU:     1500 bytes          Coverage Length:  856 bytes
174
175  UDP-Lite will ship the 1536 bytes in two separate packets:
176
177  Packet 1: 1024 payload + 8 byte header + 20 byte IP header = 1052 bytes
178  Packet 2:  512 payload + 8 byte header + 20 byte IP header =  540 bytes
179
180  The coverage packet covers the UDP-Lite header and 848 bytes of the
181  payload in the first packet, the second packet is fully covered. Note
182  that for the second packet, the coverage length exceeds the packet
183  length. The kernel always re-adjusts the coverage length to the packet
184  length in such cases.
185
186  As an example of what happens when one UDP-Lite packet is split into
187  several tiny fragments, consider the following example.
188
189  Payload: 1024 bytes            Send buffer size: 1024 bytes
190  MTU:      300 bytes            Coverage length:   575 bytes
191
192  +-+-----------+--------------+--------------+--------------+
193  |8|    272    |      280     |     280      |     280      |
194  +-+-----------+--------------+--------------+--------------+
195               280            560            840           1032
196                                    ^
197  *****checksum coverage*************
198
199  The UDP-Lite module generates one 1032 byte packet (1024 + 8 byte
200  header). According to the interface MTU, these are split into 4 IP
201  packets (280 byte IP payload + 20 byte IP header). The kernel module
202  sums the contents of the entire first two packets, plus 15 bytes of
203  the last packet before releasing the fragments to the IP module.
204
205  To see the analogous case for IPv6 fragmentation, consider a link
206  MTU of 1280 bytes and a write buffer of 3356 bytes. If the checksum
207  coverage is less than 1232 bytes (MTU minus IPv6/fragment header
208  lengths), only the first fragment needs to be considered. When using
209  larger checksum coverage lengths, each eligible fragment needs to be
210  checksummed. Suppose we have a checksum coverage of 3062. The buffer
211  of 3356 bytes will be split into the following fragments:
212
213    Fragment 1: 1280 bytes carrying  1232 bytes of UDP-Lite data
214    Fragment 2: 1280 bytes carrying  1232 bytes of UDP-Lite data
215    Fragment 3:  948 bytes carrying   900 bytes of UDP-Lite data
216
217  The first two fragments have to be checksummed in full, of the last
218  fragment only 598 (= 3062 - 2*1232) bytes are checksummed.
219
220  While it is important that such cases are dealt with correctly, they
221  are (annoyingly) rare: UDP-Lite is designed for optimising multimedia
222  performance over wireless (or generally noisy) links and thus smaller
223  coverage lengths are likely to be expected.
224
225
226  V) UDP-LITE RUNTIME STATISTICS AND THEIR MEANING
227
228  Exceptional and error conditions are logged to syslog at the KERN_DEBUG
229  level.  Live statistics about UDP-Lite are available in /proc/net/snmp
230  and can (with newer versions of netstat) be viewed using
231
232                            netstat -svu
233
234  This displays UDP-Lite statistics variables, whose meaning is as follows.
235
236   InDatagrams:     The total number of datagrams delivered to users.
237
238   NoPorts:         Number of packets received to an unknown port.
239                    These cases are counted separately (not as InErrors).
240
241   InErrors:        Number of erroneous UDP-Lite packets. Errors include:
242                      * internal socket queue receive errors
243                      * packet too short (less than 8 bytes or stated
244                        coverage length exceeds received length)
245                      * xfrm4_policy_check() returned with error
246                      * application has specified larger min. coverage
247                        length than that of incoming packet
248                      * checksum coverage violated
249                      * bad checksum
250
251   OutDatagrams:    Total number of sent datagrams.
252
253   These statistics derive from the UDP MIB (RFC 2013).
254
255
256  VI) IPTABLES
257
258  There is packet match support for UDP-Lite as well as support for the LOG target.
259  If you copy and paste the following line into /etc/protocols,
260
261  udplite 136     UDP-Lite        # UDP-Lite [RFC 3828]
262
263  then
264              iptables -A INPUT -p udplite -j LOG
265
266  will produce logging output to syslog. Dropping and rejecting packets also works.
267
268
269  VII) MAINTAINER ADDRESS
270
271  The UDP-Lite patch was developed at
272                    University of Aberdeen
273                    Electronics Research Group
274                    Department of Engineering
275                    Fraser Noble Building
276                    Aberdeen AB24 3UE; UK
277  The current maintainer is Gerrit Renker, <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>. Initial
278  code was developed by William  Stanislaus, <william@erg.abdn.ac.uk>.
279