1 2 Submitting devicetree (DT) binding patches 3 4I. For patch submitters 5 6 0) Normal patch submission rules from Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst 7 applies. 8 9 1) The Documentation/ and include/dt-bindings/ portion of the patch should 10 be a separate patch. The preferred subject prefix for binding patches is: 11 12 "dt-bindings: <binding dir>: ..." 13 14 The 80 characters of the subject are precious. It is recommended to not 15 use "Documentation" or "doc" because that is implied. All bindings are 16 docs. Repeating "binding" again should also be avoided. 17 18 2) Submit the entire series to the devicetree mailinglist at 19 20 devicetree@vger.kernel.org 21 22 and Cc: the DT maintainers. Use scripts/get_maintainer.pl to identify 23 all of the DT maintainers. 24 25 3) The Documentation/ portion of the patch should come in the series before 26 the code implementing the binding. 27 28 4) Any compatible strings used in a chip or board DTS file must be 29 previously documented in the corresponding DT binding text file 30 in Documentation/devicetree/bindings. This rule applies even if 31 the Linux device driver does not yet match on the compatible 32 string. [ checkpatch will emit warnings if this step is not 33 followed as of commit bff5da4335256513497cc8c79f9a9d1665e09864 34 ("checkpatch: add DT compatible string documentation checks"). ] 35 36 5) The wildcard "<chip>" may be used in compatible strings, as in 37 the following example: 38 39 - compatible: Must contain '"nvidia,<chip>-pcie", 40 "nvidia,tegra20-pcie"' where <chip> is tegra30, tegra132, ... 41 42 As in the above example, the known values of "<chip>" should be 43 documented if it is used. 44 45 6) If a documented compatible string is not yet matched by the 46 driver, the documentation should also include a compatible 47 string that is matched by the driver (as in the "nvidia,tegra20-pcie" 48 example above). 49 50 51II. For kernel maintainers 52 53 1) If you aren't comfortable reviewing a given binding, reply to it and ask 54 the devicetree maintainers for guidance. This will help them prioritize 55 which ones to review and which ones are ok to let go. 56 57 2) For driver (not subsystem) bindings: If you are comfortable with the 58 binding, and it hasn't received an Acked-by from the devicetree 59 maintainers after a few weeks, go ahead and take it. 60 61 Subsystem bindings (anything affecting more than a single device) 62 then getting a devicetree maintainer to review it is required. 63 64 3) For a series going though multiple trees, the binding patch should be 65 kept with the driver using the binding. 66 67III. Notes 68 69 0) Please see ...bindings/ABI.txt for details regarding devicetree ABI. 70 71 1) This document is intended as a general familiarization with the process as 72 decided at the 2013 Kernel Summit. When in doubt, the current word of the 73 devicetree maintainers overrules this document. In that situation, a patch 74 updating this document would be appreciated. 75