Searched refs:timo (Results 1 – 5 of 5) sorted by relevance
| /Linux-v6.6/security/keys/ |
| D | proc.c | 162 u64 timo; in proc_keys_show() local
206 timo = expiry - now; in proc_keys_show()
208 if (timo < 60) in proc_keys_show()
209 sprintf(xbuf, "%llus", timo); in proc_keys_show()
210 else if (timo < 60*60) in proc_keys_show()
211 sprintf(xbuf, "%llum", div_u64(timo, 60)); in proc_keys_show()
212 else if (timo < 60*60*24) in proc_keys_show()
213 sprintf(xbuf, "%lluh", div_u64(timo, 60 * 60)); in proc_keys_show()
214 else if (timo < 60*60*24*7) in proc_keys_show()
215 sprintf(xbuf, "%llud", div_u64(timo, 60 * 60 * 24)); in proc_keys_show()
[all …]
|
| /Linux-v6.6/tools/testing/selftests/futex/include/ |
| D | futex2test.h | 19 unsigned long flags, struct timespec *timo, clockid_t clockid) in futex_waitv() argument
21 return syscall(__NR_futex_waitv, waiters, nr_waiters, flags, timo, clockid); in futex_waitv()
|
| /Linux-v6.6/net/rxrpc/ |
| D | input.c | 288 unsigned long now, timo; in rxrpc_receiving_reply() local
293 timo = now + MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET; in rxrpc_receiving_reply()
295 WRITE_ONCE(call->delay_ack_at, timo); in rxrpc_receiving_reply()
588 unsigned long timo = READ_ONCE(call->next_req_timo); in rxrpc_input_data() local
591 if (timo) { in rxrpc_input_data()
593 expect_req_by = now + timo; in rxrpc_input_data()
962 unsigned long timo; in rxrpc_input_call_packet() local
973 timo = READ_ONCE(call->next_rx_timo); in rxrpc_input_call_packet()
974 if (timo) { in rxrpc_input_call_packet()
977 expect_rx_by = now + timo; in rxrpc_input_call_packet()
|
| /Linux-v6.6/fs/afs/ |
| D | fs_probe.c | 442 unsigned long timo = 2 * HZ; in afs_wait_for_one_fs_probe() local
451 if (timo == 0 || in afs_wait_for_one_fs_probe()
456 timo = schedule_timeout(timo); in afs_wait_for_one_fs_probe()
466 if (timo == 0) in afs_wait_for_one_fs_probe()
|
| /Linux-v6.6/Documentation/translations/sp_SP/ |
| D | memory-barriers.txt | 1649 en el siguiente código, que, aunque en cierto sentido es legítimo
|
