Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched refs:submitter (Results 1 – 8 of 8) sorted by relevance

/Linux-v5.4/tools/io_uring/
Dio_uring-bench.c72 struct submitter { struct
93 static struct submitter submitters[1]; argument
107 static int io_uring_register_buffers(struct submitter *s) in io_uring_register_buffers()
116 static int io_uring_register_files(struct submitter *s) in io_uring_register_files()
138 static unsigned file_depth(struct submitter *s) in file_depth()
143 static void init_io(struct submitter *s, unsigned index) in init_io()
194 static int prep_more_ios(struct submitter *s, unsigned max_ios) in prep_more_ios()
244 static int reap_events(struct submitter *s) in reap_events()
280 struct submitter *s = data; in submitter_fn()
389 static int setup_ring(struct submitter *s) in setup_ring()
[all …]
/Linux-v5.4/Documentation/process/
Dstable-kernel-rules.rst42 https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/davem/stable/?series=&submitter=&state=*&q=&archive=
154 the patch (unless the submitter is the maintainer of the area) and CC: to
Dsubmitting-drivers.rst71 It's best if the submitter and copyright owner
Dsubmitting-patches.rst471 rule (c), you should ask the submitter to rediff, but this is a totally
473 the code, but then it is very impolite to change one submitter's code and
487 and protect the submitter from complaints. Note that under no circumstances
610 have been communicated back to the submitter. I am satisfied
611 with the submitter's response to my comments.
/Linux-v5.4/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/
Dstable-kernel-rules.rst49 https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/davem/stable/?series=&submitter=&state=*&q=&archive=
/Linux-v5.4/Documentation/driver-api/dmaengine/
Dprovider.rst311 initialized in order for the submitter to be notified that a
/Linux-v5.4/Documentation/filesystems/
Dorangefs.txt317 * given up - submitter has given up waiting for it
/Linux-v5.4/Documentation/bpf/
Dbpf_devel_QA.rst78 changed to 'Accepted' and the submitter will be notified by mail. This