updelay (reference) in projects: Linux-v6.1

Project(s)

Full Search
Definition
Symbol
File Path
History
Type

Searched refs:updelay (Results 1 – 7 of 7) sorted by relevance

/Linux-v6.1/drivers/net/bonding/
D	bond_main.c	103 static int updelay; variable 136 module_param(updelay, int, 0); 137 MODULE_PARM_DESC(updelay, "Delay before considering link up, in milliseconds"); 1101 int mintime = bond->params.updelay; in bond_find_best_slave() 1177 (bond->params.updelay - new_active->delay) * bond->params.miimon); in bond_change_active_slave() 2028 if (bond->params.updelay) { in bond_enslave() 2032 new_slave->delay = bond->params.updelay; in bond_enslave() 2590 slave->delay = bond->params.updelay; in bond_miimon_inspect() 2595 bond->params.updelay * in bond_miimon_inspect() 2603 (bond->params.updelay - slave->delay) * in bond_miimon_inspect() [all …]
D	bond_netlink.c	`227 int updelay = nla_get_u32(data[IFLA_BOND_UPDELAY]); in bond_changelink() local 229 bond_opt_initval(&newval, updelay); in bond_changelink() 648 bond->params.updelay * bond->params.miimon)) in bond_fill_info()`
D	bond_sysfs.c	`336 return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", bond->params.updelay * bond->params.miimon); in bonding_show_updelay() 339 static DEVICE_ATTR(updelay, 0644,`
D	bond_procfs.c	`105 bond->params.updelay * bond->params.miimon); in bond_info_show_master()`
D	bond_options.c	`967 if (bond->params.updelay) in bond_option_miimon_set() 969 bond->params.updelay * bond->params.miimon); in bond_option_miimon_set() 1035 &bond->params.updelay); in bond_option_updelay_set()`
/Linux-v6.1/include/net/
D	bonding.h	`133 int updelay; member`
/Linux-v6.1/Documentation/networking/
D	bonding.rst	498 appropriate updelay setting may be required. 725 clients. The updelay parameter (detailed below) must 868 updelay 872 only valid for the miimon link monitor. The updelay value 2613 value to the updelay bonding module option to delay the use of the 2618 the switch is initializing. Again, an appropriate updelay value may 2623 updelay parameter has been specified (the updelay is ignored in this 2624 case). If there are slave interfaces waiting for the updelay timeout 2627 value of updelay has been overestimated, and since this occurs only in 2629 ignoring the updelay.