Searched refs:nmissed (Results 1 – 9 of 9) sorted by relevance
36 fp->nmissed++; in fprobe_handler()46 fp->nmissed++; in fprobe_handler()65 fp->nmissed++; in fprobe_kprobe_handler()118 fp->nmissed = 0; in fprobe_init()
1179 unsigned long nmissed; in probes_profile_seq_show() local1185 nmissed = trace_kprobe_is_return(tk) ? in probes_profile_seq_show()1186 tk->rp.kp.nmissed + tk->rp.nmissed : tk->rp.kp.nmissed; in probes_profile_seq_show()1190 nmissed); in probes_profile_seq_show()
29 unsigned long nmissed; member
67 unsigned long nmissed; member152 int nmissed; member
102 my_kretprobe.nmissed, my_kretprobe.kp.symbol_name); in kretprobe_exit()
143 symbol, nhit, sample_probe.nmissed); in fprobe_exit()
149 The `fprobe` data structure has `fprobe::nmissed` counter field as same as159 The `fprobe::nmissed` field counts up in both cases. Therefore, the former
57 a post_handler, and how to use the maxactive and nmissed fields of138 some probes. In the kretprobe struct, the nmissed field is set to165 object available, then in addition to incrementing the nmissed count,568 handlers won't be run in that instance, and the kprobe.nmissed member
1232 p->nmissed++; in kprobes_inc_nmissed_count()1235 kp->nmissed++; in kprobes_inc_nmissed_count()1624 p->nmissed = 0; in register_kprobe()2086 rp->nmissed++; in NOKPROBE_SYMBOL()2117 rp->nmissed++; in pre_handler_kretprobe()2238 rp->nmissed = 0; in register_kretprobe()2265 rp->nmissed = 0; in register_kretprobe()
