Searched refs:PTR_TO_STACK (Results 1 – 6 of 6) sorted by relevance
130 if (reg->type != PTR_TO_STACK) { in nfp_bpf_stack_arg_ok()236 NFP_BPF_STACK != PTR_TO_STACK || in nfp_bpf_check_helper_call()264 reg1->type != PTR_TO_STACK && in nfp_bpf_check_helper_call()272 if (reg1->type == PTR_TO_STACK && in nfp_bpf_check_helper_call()458 reg->type != PTR_TO_STACK && in nfp_bpf_check_ptr()465 if (reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK) { in nfp_bpf_check_ptr()
2876 if (meta->ptr.type == PTR_TO_STACK) in mem_ldx()2987 if (meta->ptr.type == PTR_TO_STACK) in mem_stx()
48 are PTR_TO_CTX, PTR_TO_MAP, PTR_TO_STACK. They are bounds and alignment checked.71 If R6=PTR_TO_STACK, then access should be aligned and be within85 Though R10 is correct read-only register and has type PTR_TO_STACK134 PTR_TO_STACK
551 [PTR_TO_STACK] = "fp", in reg_type_str()858 if ((t == SCALAR_VALUE || t == PTR_TO_STACK) && in print_verifier_state()1760 regs[BPF_REG_FP].type = PTR_TO_STACK; in init_reg_state()2947 case PTR_TO_STACK: in is_spillable_regtype()3087 if (state != cur && reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK) { in check_stack_write_fixed_off()4183 case PTR_TO_STACK: in check_ptr_alignment()4864 } else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK) { in check_mem_access()5253 case PTR_TO_STACK: in check_helper_mem_access()5285 verbose(env, "expected=%s\n", reg_type_str(env, PTR_TO_STACK)); in check_helper_mem_access()5644 PTR_TO_STACK,[all …]
6487 if (reg->type != PTR_TO_STACK) { in btf_check_func_arg_match()
632 PTR_TO_STACK, /* reg == frame_pointer + offset */ enumerator
