updelay (reference) in projects: Linux-v5.15

Project(s)	No entries found Still loading data...

Full Search
Definition
Symbol
File Path
History
Type

Searched refs:updelay (Results 1 – 7 of 7) sorted by relevance

/Linux-v5.15/drivers/net/bonding/
D	bond_main.c	100 static int updelay; variable 133 module_param(updelay, int, 0); 134 MODULE_PARM_DESC(updelay, "Delay before considering link up, in milliseconds"); 1072 int mintime = bond->params.updelay; in bond_find_best_slave() 1148 (bond->params.updelay - new_active->delay) * bond->params.miimon); in bond_change_active_slave() 1997 if (bond->params.updelay) { in bond_enslave() 2001 new_slave->delay = bond->params.updelay; in bond_enslave() 2561 slave->delay = bond->params.updelay; in bond_miimon_inspect() 2566 bond->params.updelay * in bond_miimon_inspect() 2574 (bond->params.updelay - slave->delay) * in bond_miimon_inspect() [all …]
D	bond_netlink.c	`205 int updelay = nla_get_u32(data[IFLA_BOND_UPDELAY]); in bond_changelink() local 207 bond_opt_initval(&newval, updelay); in bond_changelink() 553 bond->params.updelay * bond->params.miimon)) in bond_fill_info()`
D	bond_procfs.c	`105 bond->params.updelay * bond->params.miimon); in bond_info_show_master()`
D	bond_sysfs.c	`324 return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", bond->params.updelay * bond->params.miimon); in bonding_show_updelay() 327 static DEVICE_ATTR(updelay, 0644,`
D	bond_options.c	`910 if (bond->params.updelay) in bond_option_miimon_set() 912 bond->params.updelay * bond->params.miimon); in bond_option_miimon_set() 978 &bond->params.updelay); in bond_option_updelay_set()`
/Linux-v5.15/include/net/
D	bonding.h	`129 int updelay; member`
/Linux-v5.15/Documentation/networking/
D	bonding.rst	475 appropriate updelay setting may be required. 702 clients. The updelay parameter (detailed below) must 834 updelay 838 only valid for the miimon link monitor. The updelay value 2588 value to the updelay bonding module option to delay the use of the 2593 the switch is initializing. Again, an appropriate updelay value may 2598 updelay parameter has been specified (the updelay is ignored in this 2599 case). If there are slave interfaces waiting for the updelay timeout 2602 value of updelay has been overestimated, and since this occurs only in 2604 ignoring the updelay.