Searched refs:avg_lat (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
1902 unsigned int avg_lat; member1947 __entry->d_rd_avg = iostat_lat[0][DATA].avg_lat;1950 __entry->n_rd_avg = iostat_lat[0][NODE].avg_lat;1953 __entry->m_rd_avg = iostat_lat[0][META].avg_lat;1956 __entry->d_wr_s_avg = iostat_lat[1][DATA].avg_lat;1959 __entry->n_wr_s_avg = iostat_lat[1][NODE].avg_lat;1962 __entry->m_wr_s_avg = iostat_lat[1][META].avg_lat;1965 __entry->d_wr_as_avg = iostat_lat[2][DATA].avg_lat;1968 __entry->n_wr_as_avg = iostat_lat[2][NODE].avg_lat;1971 __entry->m_wr_as_avg = iostat_lat[2][META].avg_lat;
922 unsigned long long avg_lat; in iolatency_pd_stat() local931 avg_lat = div64_u64(iolat->lat_avg, NSEC_PER_USEC); in iolatency_pd_stat()935 avg_lat, cur_win); in iolatency_pd_stat()938 iolat->rq_depth.max_depth, avg_lat, cur_win); in iolatency_pd_stat()
102 iostat_lat[idx][io].avg_lat = cnt ? in __record_iostat_latency()
1829 avg_lat value in io.stat for your workload group to get an idea of the1830 latency you see during normal operation. Use the avg_lat value as a basis for1874 avg_lat
