Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched refs:willing (Results 1 – 25 of 50) sorted by relevance

12

/Linux-v5.10/include/uapi/linux/
Ddcbnl.h59 __u8 willing; member
191 __u8 willing; member
208 __u8 willing; member
260 __u8 willing; member
/Linux-v5.10/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/
Dice_dcb_lib.c485 err_cfg->etscfg.willing = true; in ice_dcb_rebuild()
550 dcbcfg->etscfg.willing = ets_willing ? 1 : 0; in ice_dcb_sw_dflt_cfg()
557 dcbcfg->etsrec.willing = 0; in ice_dcb_sw_dflt_cfg()
559 dcbcfg->pfc.willing = 1; in ice_dcb_sw_dflt_cfg()
623 dcbcfg->etscfg.willing = 1; in ice_dcb_noncontig_cfg()
Dice_dcb.c223 etscfg->willing = ((buf[0] & ICE_IEEE_ETS_WILLING_M) >> in ice_parse_ieee_etscfg_tlv()
269 dcbcfg->pfc.willing = ((buf[0] & ICE_IEEE_PFC_WILLING_M) >> in ice_parse_ieee_pfccfg_tlv()
387 etscfg->willing = 1; in ice_parse_cee_pgcfg_tlv()
441 dcbcfg->pfc.willing = 1; in ice_parse_cee_pfccfg_tlv()
1060 if (etscfg->willing) in ice_add_ieee_ets_tlv()
1128 if (dcbcfg->pfc.willing) in ice_add_ieee_pfc_tlv()
Dice_dcb_nl.c44 ets->willing = dcbxcfg->etscfg.willing; in ice_dcbnl_getets()
81 new_cfg->etscfg.willing = ets->willing; in ice_dcbnl_setets()
Dice_type.h465 u8 willing; member
475 u8 willing; member
/Linux-v5.10/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/
Dqed_dcbx.c526 p_params->pfc.willing = QED_MFW_GET_FIELD(pfc, DCBX_PFC_WILLING); in qed_dcbx_get_pfc_data()
541 p_params->pfc.willing, pfc_map, p_params->pfc.max_tc, in qed_dcbx_get_pfc_data()
1029 if (p_params->pfc.willing) in qed_dcbx_set_pfc_data()
1899 bool enabled, willing; in qed_dcbnl_setfeatcfg() local
1911 willing = !!(flags & DCB_FEATCFG_WILLING); in qed_dcbnl_setfeatcfg()
1916 dcbx_set.config.params.ets_willing = willing; in qed_dcbnl_setfeatcfg()
1921 dcbx_set.config.params.pfc.willing = willing; in qed_dcbnl_setfeatcfg()
1925 dcbx_set.config.params.app_willing = willing; in qed_dcbnl_setfeatcfg()
1954 info->willing = dcbx_info->remote.params.app_willing; in qed_dcbnl_peer_getappinfo()
2020 pg->willing = dcbx_info->remote.params.ets_willing; in qed_dcbnl_cee_peer_getpg()
[all …]
/Linux-v5.10/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/
Di40e_dcb_nl.c42 ets->willing = dcbxcfg->etscfg.willing; in i40e_dcbnl_ieee_getets()
Di40e_dcb.c53 etscfg->willing = (u8)((buf[offset] & I40E_IEEE_ETS_WILLING_MASK) >> in i40e_parse_ieee_etscfg_tlv()
173 dcbcfg->pfc.willing = (u8)((buf[0] & I40E_IEEE_PFC_WILLING_MASK) >> in i40e_parse_ieee_pfccfg_tlv()
290 etscfg->willing = 1; in i40e_parse_cee_pgcfg_tlv()
337 dcbcfg->pfc.willing = 1; in i40e_parse_cee_pfccfg_tlv()
Di40e_type.h492 u8 willing; member
502 u8 willing; member
Di40e_debugfs.c1077 cfg->etscfg.willing, cfg->etscfg.cbs, in i40e_dbg_command_write()
1093 cfg->pfc.willing, cfg->pfc.mbc, in i40e_dbg_command_write()
1106 r_cfg->etscfg.willing, in i40e_dbg_command_write()
1122 r_cfg->pfc.willing, in i40e_dbg_command_write()
/Linux-v5.10/Documentation/i2c/busses/
Di2c-sis96x.rst48 AND is willing to risk crashing & burning an otherwise well-behaved kernel
/Linux-v5.10/Documentation/usb/
Dauthorization.rst69 security verification you can make (or the best, for someone willing
/Linux-v5.10/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/
Dcxgb4_dcb.c956 ets->willing = 1; in cxgb4_ieee_read_ets()
1120 info->willing = 0; in cxgb4_getpeer_app()
1192 pg->willing = true; in cxgb4_cee_peer_getpg()
/Linux-v5.10/Documentation/power/
Denergy-model.rst12 subsystems willing to use that information to make energy-aware decisions.
/Linux-v5.10/Documentation/driver-api/usb/
Dcallbacks.rst18 Called to see if the driver is willing to manage a particular
/Linux-v5.10/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/
Dhclge_dcb.c51 ets->willing = 1; in hclge_tm_info_to_ieee_ets()
/Linux-v5.10/Documentation/security/
Dlsm.rst28 remarks that described a security framework he would be willing to
/Linux-v5.10/Documentation/vm/
Dbalance.rst14 be that the caller is willing to fail the allocation without incurring the
/Linux-v5.10/Documentation/doc-guide/
Dcontributing.rst165 service. I am always willing to accept such patches. That said, once you
204 course. Developers are often more than willing to cooperate with people
/Linux-v5.10/Documentation/locking/
Dseqlock.rst11 reader wants a consistent set of information and is willing to retry if
/Linux-v5.10/Documentation/process/
Dcode-of-conduct-interpretation.rst48 Maintainers should be willing to help when problems occur, and work with
Dhowto.rst460 You have to be cooperative, and willing to adapt your idea to fit within
461 the kernel. Or at least be willing to prove your idea is worth it.
462 Remember, being wrong is acceptable as long as you are willing to work
/Linux-v5.10/net/wireless/
DKconfig76 and willing to ensure your system will remain regulatory
/Linux-v5.10/Documentation/filesystems/
Dafs.rst95 R/O volume, but are willing to use a R/W volume instead (hash).
/Linux-v5.10/arch/parisc/
DKconfig228 At the moment, only people willing to use more than 2GB of RAM,

12