updelay (reference) in projects: Linux-v5.10

Project(s)

Full Search
Definition
Symbol
File Path
History
Type

Searched refs:updelay (Results 1 – 7 of 7) sorted by relevance

/Linux-v5.10/drivers/net/bonding/
D	bond_main.c	97 static int updelay; variable 130 module_param(updelay, int, 0); 131 MODULE_PARM_DESC(updelay, "Delay before considering link up, in milliseconds"); 910 int mintime = bond->params.updelay; in bond_find_best_slave() 987 (bond->params.updelay - new_active->delay) * bond->params.miimon); in bond_change_active_slave() 1815 if (bond->params.updelay) { in bond_enslave() 1819 new_slave->delay = bond->params.updelay; in bond_enslave() 2331 slave->delay = bond->params.updelay; in bond_miimon_inspect() 2336 bond->params.updelay * in bond_miimon_inspect() 2344 (bond->params.updelay - slave->delay) * in bond_miimon_inspect() [all …]
D	bond_netlink.c	`204 int updelay = nla_get_u32(data[IFLA_BOND_UPDELAY]); in bond_changelink() local 206 bond_opt_initval(&newval, updelay); in bond_changelink() 541 bond->params.updelay * bond->params.miimon)) in bond_fill_info()`
D	bond_sysfs.c	`324 return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", bond->params.updelay * bond->params.miimon); in bonding_show_updelay() 327 static DEVICE_ATTR(updelay, 0644,`
D	bond_procfs.c	`104 bond->params.updelay * bond->params.miimon); in bond_info_show_master()`
D	bond_options.c	`863 if (bond->params.updelay) in bond_option_miimon_set() 865 bond->params.updelay * bond->params.miimon); in bond_option_miimon_set() 931 &bond->params.updelay); in bond_option_updelay_set()`
/Linux-v5.10/include/net/
D	bonding.h	`127 int updelay; member`
/Linux-v5.10/Documentation/networking/
D	bonding.rst	475 appropriate updelay setting may be required. 690 clients. The updelay parameter (detailed below) must 822 updelay 826 only valid for the miimon link monitor. The updelay value 2563 value to the updelay bonding module option to delay the use of the 2568 the switch is initializing. Again, an appropriate updelay value may 2573 updelay parameter has been specified (the updelay is ignored in this 2574 case). If there are slave interfaces waiting for the updelay timeout 2577 value of updelay has been overestimated, and since this occurs only in 2579 ignoring the updelay.