Searched refs:erasing (Results 1 – 16 of 16) sorted by relevance
92 shared[i].writing = shared[i].erasing = NULL; in lpddr_cmdset()254 if (mode == FL_ERASING && shared->erasing in get_chip()255 && shared->erasing->oldstate == FL_ERASING) { in get_chip()269 shared->erasing = chip; in get_chip()341 shared->writing = shared->erasing; in put_chip()354 shared->erasing = NULL; in put_chip()356 } else if (shared->erasing == chip && shared->writing != chip) { in put_chip()
45 including the whole card. When erasing a large area it may49 is being erased, but erasing one partition will make63 size for erasing large areas.
109 struct flchip *erasing; member
22 Many flash memories support erasing small (4096 B) sectors. Depending24 to erasing whole blocks (32/64 KiB).26 small sectors. On the other hand erasing should be faster when using
164 erasing = 0, bad = 0, unchecked = 0; in __jffs2_dbg_superblock_counts() local251 erasing += c->sector_size; in __jffs2_dbg_superblock_counts()255 erasing += c->sector_size; in __jffs2_dbg_superblock_counts()259 erasing += c->sector_size; in __jffs2_dbg_superblock_counts()281 check(erasing); in __jffs2_dbg_superblock_counts()
47 solo_dev->erasing = 1; in erase_on()53 if (!solo_dev->erasing) in erase_off()61 solo_dev->erasing = 0; in erase_off()
230 unsigned int erasing; member
106 unsigned char lnext:1, erasing:1, raw:1, real_raw:1, icanon:1; member325 ldata->erasing = 0; in reset_buffer_flags()945 if (ldata->erasing) { in finish_erasing()947 ldata->erasing = 0; in finish_erasing()1023 if (!ldata->erasing) { in eraser()1025 ldata->erasing = 1; in eraser()1796 ldata->erasing = 0; in n_tty_set_termios()
85 * accidentally erasing critical flash sectors. We thus define
64 * accidentally erasing critical flash sectors. We thus define
104 * accidentally erasing critical flash sectors. We thus define
775 shared[i].writing = shared[i].erasing = NULL; in cfi_intelext_partition_fixup()993 if (mode == FL_ERASING && shared->erasing in get_chip()994 && shared->erasing->oldstate == FL_ERASING) { in get_chip()1008 shared->erasing = chip; in get_chip()1027 shared->writing = shared->erasing; in put_chip()1040 shared->erasing = NULL; in put_chip()1042 } else if (shared->erasing == chip && shared->writing != chip) { in put_chip()
239 and erasing nodes.256 When erasing a node, the user must call rb_erase_augmented() instead of
482 block table before erasing any of the blocks.807 as you want to a page. The consecutive writes to a page, before erasing
15 read-write-erases) before erasing the commit record. Should the system
155 securely erasing their keys. (Not yet implemented.)
