Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched refs:dire (Results 1 – 5 of 5) sorted by relevance

/Linux-v4.19/fs/squashfs/
Ddir.c118 struct squashfs_dir_entry *dire; in squashfs_readdir() local
122 dire = kmalloc(sizeof(*dire) + SQUASHFS_NAME_LEN + 1, GFP_KERNEL); in squashfs_readdir()
123 if (dire == NULL) { in squashfs_readdir()
183 err = squashfs_read_metadata(inode->i_sb, dire, &block, in squashfs_readdir()
184 &offset, sizeof(*dire)); in squashfs_readdir()
188 size = le16_to_cpu(dire->size) + 1; in squashfs_readdir()
194 err = squashfs_read_metadata(inode->i_sb, dire->name, in squashfs_readdir()
199 length += sizeof(*dire) + size; in squashfs_readdir()
204 dire->name[size] = '\0'; in squashfs_readdir()
206 ((short) le16_to_cpu(dire->inode_number)); in squashfs_readdir()
[all …]
Dnamei.c147 struct squashfs_dir_entry *dire; in squashfs_lookup() local
155 dire = kmalloc(sizeof(*dire) + SQUASHFS_NAME_LEN + 1, GFP_KERNEL); in squashfs_lookup()
156 if (dire == NULL) { in squashfs_lookup()
191 err = squashfs_read_metadata(dir->i_sb, dire, &block, in squashfs_lookup()
192 &offset, sizeof(*dire)); in squashfs_lookup()
196 size = le16_to_cpu(dire->size) + 1; in squashfs_lookup()
202 err = squashfs_read_metadata(dir->i_sb, dire->name, in squashfs_lookup()
207 length += sizeof(*dire) + size; in squashfs_lookup()
209 if (name[0] < dire->name[0]) in squashfs_lookup()
212 if (len == size && !strncmp(name, dire->name, len)) { in squashfs_lookup()
[all …]
/Linux-v4.19/fs/afs/
Ddir.c322 union afs_xdr_dirent *dire; in afs_dir_iterate_block() local
350 dire = &block->dirents[offset]; in afs_dir_iterate_block()
351 nlen = strnlen(dire->u.name, in afs_dir_iterate_block()
358 nlen, dire->u.name); in afs_dir_iterate_block()
390 if (!dir_emit(ctx, dire->u.name, nlen, in afs_dir_iterate_block()
391 ntohl(dire->u.vnode), in afs_dir_iterate_block()
394 ntohl(dire->u.unique) : DT_UNKNOWN)) { in afs_dir_iterate_block()
/Linux-v4.19/Documentation/translations/it_IT/kernel-hacking/
Dlocking.rst298 anche questi. Tenuto conto di questo si può dire che
820 - Si può togliere static da ``cache_lock`` e dire agli utenti che devono
959 *lock* non ne capisco abbastanza del kernel per dire in quale dei 5000 *lock*
1105 sarebbe uno spreco) possiamo dire che questo meccanismo permette
Dhacking.rst93 Potete dire d'essere in una interruzione hardware perché :c:func:`in_irq()`