1relay interface (formerly relayfs)
2==================================
3
4The relay interface provides a means for kernel applications to
5efficiently log and transfer large quantities of data from the kernel
6to userspace via user-defined 'relay channels'.
7
8A 'relay channel' is a kernel->user data relay mechanism implemented
9as a set of per-cpu kernel buffers ('channel buffers'), each
10represented as a regular file ('relay file') in user space.  Kernel
11clients write into the channel buffers using efficient write
12functions; these automatically log into the current cpu's channel
13buffer.  User space applications mmap() or read() from the relay files
14and retrieve the data as it becomes available.  The relay files
15themselves are files created in a host filesystem, e.g. debugfs, and
16are associated with the channel buffers using the API described below.
17
18The format of the data logged into the channel buffers is completely
19up to the kernel client; the relay interface does however provide
20hooks which allow kernel clients to impose some structure on the
21buffer data.  The relay interface doesn't implement any form of data
22filtering - this also is left to the kernel client.  The purpose is to
23keep things as simple as possible.
24
25This document provides an overview of the relay interface API.  The
26details of the function parameters are documented along with the
27functions in the relay interface code - please see that for details.
28
29Semantics
30=========
31
32Each relay channel has one buffer per CPU, each buffer has one or more
33sub-buffers.  Messages are written to the first sub-buffer until it is
34too full to contain a new message, in which case it is written to
35the next (if available).  Messages are never split across sub-buffers.
36At this point, userspace can be notified so it empties the first
37sub-buffer, while the kernel continues writing to the next.
38
39When notified that a sub-buffer is full, the kernel knows how many
40bytes of it are padding i.e. unused space occurring because a complete
41message couldn't fit into a sub-buffer.  Userspace can use this
42knowledge to copy only valid data.
43
44After copying it, userspace can notify the kernel that a sub-buffer
45has been consumed.
46
47A relay channel can operate in a mode where it will overwrite data not
48yet collected by userspace, and not wait for it to be consumed.
49
50The relay channel itself does not provide for communication of such
51data between userspace and kernel, allowing the kernel side to remain
52simple and not impose a single interface on userspace.  It does
53provide a set of examples and a separate helper though, described
54below.
55
56The read() interface both removes padding and internally consumes the
57read sub-buffers; thus in cases where read(2) is being used to drain
58the channel buffers, special-purpose communication between kernel and
59user isn't necessary for basic operation.
60
61One of the major goals of the relay interface is to provide a low
62overhead mechanism for conveying kernel data to userspace.  While the
63read() interface is easy to use, it's not as efficient as the mmap()
64approach; the example code attempts to make the tradeoff between the
65two approaches as small as possible.
66
67klog and relay-apps example code
68================================
69
70The relay interface itself is ready to use, but to make things easier,
71a couple simple utility functions and a set of examples are provided.
72
73The relay-apps example tarball, available on the relay sourceforge
74site, contains a set of self-contained examples, each consisting of a
75pair of .c files containing boilerplate code for each of the user and
76kernel sides of a relay application.  When combined these two sets of
77boilerplate code provide glue to easily stream data to disk, without
78having to bother with mundane housekeeping chores.
79
80The 'klog debugging functions' patch (klog.patch in the relay-apps
81tarball) provides a couple of high-level logging functions to the
82kernel which allow writing formatted text or raw data to a channel,
83regardless of whether a channel to write into exists or not, or even
84whether the relay interface is compiled into the kernel or not.  These
85functions allow you to put unconditional 'trace' statements anywhere
86in the kernel or kernel modules; only when there is a 'klog handler'
87registered will data actually be logged (see the klog and kleak
88examples for details).
89
90It is of course possible to use the relay interface from scratch,
91i.e. without using any of the relay-apps example code or klog, but
92you'll have to implement communication between userspace and kernel,
93allowing both to convey the state of buffers (full, empty, amount of
94padding).  The read() interface both removes padding and internally
95consumes the read sub-buffers; thus in cases where read(2) is being
96used to drain the channel buffers, special-purpose communication
97between kernel and user isn't necessary for basic operation.  Things
98such as buffer-full conditions would still need to be communicated via
99some channel though.
100
101klog and the relay-apps examples can be found in the relay-apps
102tarball on http://relayfs.sourceforge.net
103
104The relay interface user space API
105==================================
106
107The relay interface implements basic file operations for user space
108access to relay channel buffer data.  Here are the file operations
109that are available and some comments regarding their behavior:
110
111open()	    enables user to open an _existing_ channel buffer.
112
113mmap()      results in channel buffer being mapped into the caller's
114	    memory space. Note that you can't do a partial mmap - you
115	    must map the entire file, which is NRBUF * SUBBUFSIZE.
116
117read()      read the contents of a channel buffer.  The bytes read are
118	    'consumed' by the reader, i.e. they won't be available
119	    again to subsequent reads.  If the channel is being used
120	    in no-overwrite mode (the default), it can be read at any
121	    time even if there's an active kernel writer.  If the
122	    channel is being used in overwrite mode and there are
123	    active channel writers, results may be unpredictable -
124	    users should make sure that all logging to the channel has
125	    ended before using read() with overwrite mode.  Sub-buffer
126	    padding is automatically removed and will not be seen by
127	    the reader.
128
129sendfile()  transfer data from a channel buffer to an output file
130	    descriptor. Sub-buffer padding is automatically removed
131	    and will not be seen by the reader.
132
133poll()      POLLIN/POLLRDNORM/POLLERR supported.  User applications are
134	    notified when sub-buffer boundaries are crossed.
135
136close()     decrements the channel buffer's refcount.  When the refcount
137	    reaches 0, i.e. when no process or kernel client has the
138	    buffer open, the channel buffer is freed.
139
140In order for a user application to make use of relay files, the
141host filesystem must be mounted.  For example,
142
143	mount -t debugfs debugfs /sys/kernel/debug
144
145NOTE:   the host filesystem doesn't need to be mounted for kernel
146	clients to create or use channels - it only needs to be
147	mounted when user space applications need access to the buffer
148	data.
149
150
151The relay interface kernel API
152==============================
153
154Here's a summary of the API the relay interface provides to in-kernel clients:
155
156TBD(curr. line MT:/API/)
157  channel management functions:
158
159    relay_open(base_filename, parent, subbuf_size, n_subbufs,
160               callbacks, private_data)
161    relay_close(chan)
162    relay_flush(chan)
163    relay_reset(chan)
164
165  channel management typically called on instigation of userspace:
166
167    relay_subbufs_consumed(chan, cpu, subbufs_consumed)
168
169  write functions:
170
171    relay_write(chan, data, length)
172    __relay_write(chan, data, length)
173    relay_reserve(chan, length)
174
175  callbacks:
176
177    subbuf_start(buf, subbuf, prev_subbuf, prev_padding)
178    buf_mapped(buf, filp)
179    buf_unmapped(buf, filp)
180    create_buf_file(filename, parent, mode, buf, is_global)
181    remove_buf_file(dentry)
182
183  helper functions:
184
185    relay_buf_full(buf)
186    subbuf_start_reserve(buf, length)
187
188
189Creating a channel
190------------------
191
192relay_open() is used to create a channel, along with its per-cpu
193channel buffers.  Each channel buffer will have an associated file
194created for it in the host filesystem, which can be and mmapped or
195read from in user space.  The files are named basename0...basenameN-1
196where N is the number of online cpus, and by default will be created
197in the root of the filesystem (if the parent param is NULL).  If you
198want a directory structure to contain your relay files, you should
199create it using the host filesystem's directory creation function,
200e.g. debugfs_create_dir(), and pass the parent directory to
201relay_open().  Users are responsible for cleaning up any directory
202structure they create, when the channel is closed - again the host
203filesystem's directory removal functions should be used for that,
204e.g. debugfs_remove().
205
206In order for a channel to be created and the host filesystem's files
207associated with its channel buffers, the user must provide definitions
208for two callback functions, create_buf_file() and remove_buf_file().
209create_buf_file() is called once for each per-cpu buffer from
210relay_open() and allows the user to create the file which will be used
211to represent the corresponding channel buffer.  The callback should
212return the dentry of the file created to represent the channel buffer.
213remove_buf_file() must also be defined; it's responsible for deleting
214the file(s) created in create_buf_file() and is called during
215relay_close().
216
217Here are some typical definitions for these callbacks, in this case
218using debugfs:
219
220/*
221 * create_buf_file() callback.  Creates relay file in debugfs.
222 */
223static struct dentry *create_buf_file_handler(const char *filename,
224                                              struct dentry *parent,
225                                              umode_t mode,
226                                              struct rchan_buf *buf,
227                                              int *is_global)
228{
229        return debugfs_create_file(filename, mode, parent, buf,
230	                           &relay_file_operations);
231}
232
233/*
234 * remove_buf_file() callback.  Removes relay file from debugfs.
235 */
236static int remove_buf_file_handler(struct dentry *dentry)
237{
238        debugfs_remove(dentry);
239
240        return 0;
241}
242
243/*
244 * relay interface callbacks
245 */
246static struct rchan_callbacks relay_callbacks =
247{
248        .create_buf_file = create_buf_file_handler,
249        .remove_buf_file = remove_buf_file_handler,
250};
251
252And an example relay_open() invocation using them:
253
254  chan = relay_open("cpu", NULL, SUBBUF_SIZE, N_SUBBUFS, &relay_callbacks, NULL);
255
256If the create_buf_file() callback fails, or isn't defined, channel
257creation and thus relay_open() will fail.
258
259The total size of each per-cpu buffer is calculated by multiplying the
260number of sub-buffers by the sub-buffer size passed into relay_open().
261The idea behind sub-buffers is that they're basically an extension of
262double-buffering to N buffers, and they also allow applications to
263easily implement random-access-on-buffer-boundary schemes, which can
264be important for some high-volume applications.  The number and size
265of sub-buffers is completely dependent on the application and even for
266the same application, different conditions will warrant different
267values for these parameters at different times.  Typically, the right
268values to use are best decided after some experimentation; in general,
269though, it's safe to assume that having only 1 sub-buffer is a bad
270idea - you're guaranteed to either overwrite data or lose events
271depending on the channel mode being used.
272
273The create_buf_file() implementation can also be defined in such a way
274as to allow the creation of a single 'global' buffer instead of the
275default per-cpu set.  This can be useful for applications interested
276mainly in seeing the relative ordering of system-wide events without
277the need to bother with saving explicit timestamps for the purpose of
278merging/sorting per-cpu files in a postprocessing step.
279
280To have relay_open() create a global buffer, the create_buf_file()
281implementation should set the value of the is_global outparam to a
282non-zero value in addition to creating the file that will be used to
283represent the single buffer.  In the case of a global buffer,
284create_buf_file() and remove_buf_file() will be called only once.  The
285normal channel-writing functions, e.g. relay_write(), can still be
286used - writes from any cpu will transparently end up in the global
287buffer - but since it is a global buffer, callers should make sure
288they use the proper locking for such a buffer, either by wrapping
289writes in a spinlock, or by copying a write function from relay.h and
290creating a local version that internally does the proper locking.
291
292The private_data passed into relay_open() allows clients to associate
293user-defined data with a channel, and is immediately available
294(including in create_buf_file()) via chan->private_data or
295buf->chan->private_data.
296
297Buffer-only channels
298--------------------
299
300These channels have no files associated and can be created with
301relay_open(NULL, NULL, ...). Such channels are useful in scenarios such
302as when doing early tracing in the kernel, before the VFS is up. In these
303cases, one may open a buffer-only channel and then call
304relay_late_setup_files() when the kernel is ready to handle files,
305to expose the buffered data to the userspace.
306
307Channel 'modes'
308---------------
309
310relay channels can be used in either of two modes - 'overwrite' or
311'no-overwrite'.  The mode is entirely determined by the implementation
312of the subbuf_start() callback, as described below.  The default if no
313subbuf_start() callback is defined is 'no-overwrite' mode.  If the
314default mode suits your needs, and you plan to use the read()
315interface to retrieve channel data, you can ignore the details of this
316section, as it pertains mainly to mmap() implementations.
317
318In 'overwrite' mode, also known as 'flight recorder' mode, writes
319continuously cycle around the buffer and will never fail, but will
320unconditionally overwrite old data regardless of whether it's actually
321been consumed.  In no-overwrite mode, writes will fail, i.e. data will
322be lost, if the number of unconsumed sub-buffers equals the total
323number of sub-buffers in the channel.  It should be clear that if
324there is no consumer or if the consumer can't consume sub-buffers fast
325enough, data will be lost in either case; the only difference is
326whether data is lost from the beginning or the end of a buffer.
327
328As explained above, a relay channel is made of up one or more
329per-cpu channel buffers, each implemented as a circular buffer
330subdivided into one or more sub-buffers.  Messages are written into
331the current sub-buffer of the channel's current per-cpu buffer via the
332write functions described below.  Whenever a message can't fit into
333the current sub-buffer, because there's no room left for it, the
334client is notified via the subbuf_start() callback that a switch to a
335new sub-buffer is about to occur.  The client uses this callback to 1)
336initialize the next sub-buffer if appropriate 2) finalize the previous
337sub-buffer if appropriate and 3) return a boolean value indicating
338whether or not to actually move on to the next sub-buffer.
339
340To implement 'no-overwrite' mode, the userspace client would provide
341an implementation of the subbuf_start() callback something like the
342following:
343
344static int subbuf_start(struct rchan_buf *buf,
345                        void *subbuf,
346			void *prev_subbuf,
347			unsigned int prev_padding)
348{
349	if (prev_subbuf)
350		*((unsigned *)prev_subbuf) = prev_padding;
351
352	if (relay_buf_full(buf))
353		return 0;
354
355	subbuf_start_reserve(buf, sizeof(unsigned int));
356
357	return 1;
358}
359
360If the current buffer is full, i.e. all sub-buffers remain unconsumed,
361the callback returns 0 to indicate that the buffer switch should not
362occur yet, i.e. until the consumer has had a chance to read the
363current set of ready sub-buffers.  For the relay_buf_full() function
364to make sense, the consumer is responsible for notifying the relay
365interface when sub-buffers have been consumed via
366relay_subbufs_consumed().  Any subsequent attempts to write into the
367buffer will again invoke the subbuf_start() callback with the same
368parameters; only when the consumer has consumed one or more of the
369ready sub-buffers will relay_buf_full() return 0, in which case the
370buffer switch can continue.
371
372The implementation of the subbuf_start() callback for 'overwrite' mode
373would be very similar:
374
375static int subbuf_start(struct rchan_buf *buf,
376                        void *subbuf,
377			void *prev_subbuf,
378			size_t prev_padding)
379{
380	if (prev_subbuf)
381		*((unsigned *)prev_subbuf) = prev_padding;
382
383	subbuf_start_reserve(buf, sizeof(unsigned int));
384
385	return 1;
386}
387
388In this case, the relay_buf_full() check is meaningless and the
389callback always returns 1, causing the buffer switch to occur
390unconditionally.  It's also meaningless for the client to use the
391relay_subbufs_consumed() function in this mode, as it's never
392consulted.
393
394The default subbuf_start() implementation, used if the client doesn't
395define any callbacks, or doesn't define the subbuf_start() callback,
396implements the simplest possible 'no-overwrite' mode, i.e. it does
397nothing but return 0.
398
399Header information can be reserved at the beginning of each sub-buffer
400by calling the subbuf_start_reserve() helper function from within the
401subbuf_start() callback.  This reserved area can be used to store
402whatever information the client wants.  In the example above, room is
403reserved in each sub-buffer to store the padding count for that
404sub-buffer.  This is filled in for the previous sub-buffer in the
405subbuf_start() implementation; the padding value for the previous
406sub-buffer is passed into the subbuf_start() callback along with a
407pointer to the previous sub-buffer, since the padding value isn't
408known until a sub-buffer is filled.  The subbuf_start() callback is
409also called for the first sub-buffer when the channel is opened, to
410give the client a chance to reserve space in it.  In this case the
411previous sub-buffer pointer passed into the callback will be NULL, so
412the client should check the value of the prev_subbuf pointer before
413writing into the previous sub-buffer.
414
415Writing to a channel
416--------------------
417
418Kernel clients write data into the current cpu's channel buffer using
419relay_write() or __relay_write().  relay_write() is the main logging
420function - it uses local_irqsave() to protect the buffer and should be
421used if you might be logging from interrupt context.  If you know
422you'll never be logging from interrupt context, you can use
423__relay_write(), which only disables preemption.  These functions
424don't return a value, so you can't determine whether or not they
425failed - the assumption is that you wouldn't want to check a return
426value in the fast logging path anyway, and that they'll always succeed
427unless the buffer is full and no-overwrite mode is being used, in
428which case you can detect a failed write in the subbuf_start()
429callback by calling the relay_buf_full() helper function.
430
431relay_reserve() is used to reserve a slot in a channel buffer which
432can be written to later.  This would typically be used in applications
433that need to write directly into a channel buffer without having to
434stage data in a temporary buffer beforehand.  Because the actual write
435may not happen immediately after the slot is reserved, applications
436using relay_reserve() can keep a count of the number of bytes actually
437written, either in space reserved in the sub-buffers themselves or as
438a separate array.  See the 'reserve' example in the relay-apps tarball
439at http://relayfs.sourceforge.net for an example of how this can be
440done.  Because the write is under control of the client and is
441separated from the reserve, relay_reserve() doesn't protect the buffer
442at all - it's up to the client to provide the appropriate
443synchronization when using relay_reserve().
444
445Closing a channel
446-----------------
447
448The client calls relay_close() when it's finished using the channel.
449The channel and its associated buffers are destroyed when there are no
450longer any references to any of the channel buffers.  relay_flush()
451forces a sub-buffer switch on all the channel buffers, and can be used
452to finalize and process the last sub-buffers before the channel is
453closed.
454
455Misc
456----
457
458Some applications may want to keep a channel around and re-use it
459rather than open and close a new channel for each use.  relay_reset()
460can be used for this purpose - it resets a channel to its initial
461state without reallocating channel buffer memory or destroying
462existing mappings.  It should however only be called when it's safe to
463do so, i.e. when the channel isn't currently being written to.
464
465Finally, there are a couple of utility callbacks that can be used for
466different purposes.  buf_mapped() is called whenever a channel buffer
467is mmapped from user space and buf_unmapped() is called when it's
468unmapped.  The client can use this notification to trigger actions
469within the kernel application, such as enabling/disabling logging to
470the channel.
471
472
473Resources
474=========
475
476For news, example code, mailing list, etc. see the relay interface homepage:
477
478    http://relayfs.sourceforge.net
479
480
481Credits
482=======
483
484The ideas and specs for the relay interface came about as a result of
485discussions on tracing involving the following:
486
487Michel Dagenais		<michel.dagenais@polymtl.ca>
488Richard Moore		<richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com>
489Bob Wisniewski		<bob@watson.ibm.com>
490Karim Yaghmour		<karim@opersys.com>
491Tom Zanussi		<zanussi@us.ibm.com>
492
493Also thanks to Hubertus Franke for a lot of useful suggestions and bug
494reports.
495