/Linux-v6.1/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/ |
D | Kconfig.debug | 15 Recommended for driver developers only. 22 depends on EXPERT # only for developers 48 Recommended for driver developers only. 61 Recommended for driver developers only. 73 Recommended for driver developers only. 88 Recommended for driver developers only. 100 Recommended for driver developers only. 114 Recommended for driver developers only. 128 Recommended for driver developers only. 141 Recommended for driver developers only. [all …]
|
D | Kconfig.unstable | 15 number of interested parties (userspace driver developers) can 19 Recommended for driver developers _only_.
|
/Linux-v6.1/Documentation/process/ |
D | 2.Process.rst | 7 with relatively small numbers of users and developers involved. With a 8 user base in the millions and with some 2,000 developers involved over the 16 The kernel developers use a loosely time-based release process, with a new 59 allowed, but such occasions are rare; developers who try to merge new 89 How do the developers decide when to close the development cycle and create 97 The developers' goal is to fix all known regressions before the stable 166 developers on that list reply with any comments they may have. This 204 One of the largest mistakes made by kernel developers (or their employers) 217 unassisted. The way the kernel developers have addressed this growth is 262 Developers will be interested in what other changes are pending to see [all …]
|
D | 3.Early-stage.rst | 22 Consider an example: some years ago, developers working with Linux audio 30 To the audio developers, this security module was sufficient to solve their 40 resulting disagreement left those developers feeling disillusioned with the 44 There are a number of very good Linux kernel developers, but they 51 The reality of the situation was different; the kernel developers were far 91 - It's entirely possible that other developers have thought about the 109 core kernel developers' opinion, should have been implemented in the 122 avoided with some early discussion with the kernel developers. 128 When developers decide to take their plans public, the next question will 133 linux-kernel; you are more likely to reach developers with expertise in the [all …]
|
D | 1.Intro.rst | 10 and the kinds of frustrations that developers and their employers can 20 discussion of tools and mailing lists. Developers wanting to get started 28 have been encountered by other developers are discussed. Some requirements for 41 avoid problems at this important stage. Developers are cautioned against 61 With the growth of Linux has come an increase in the number of developers 73 these developers; anybody with the requisite skills can improve Linux and 78 involve over 1000 developers working for more than 100 different companies 91 intimidating to new developers, but there are good reasons and solid 101 community is always in need of developers who will help to make the kernel 120 Some companies and developers occasionally wonder why they should bother [all …]
|
D | 7.AdvancedTopics.rst | 8 number of topics which can be helpful for developers wanting to become a 26 still being civilized by its developers. This document will not attempt to 29 fits into the kernel development process in particular. Developers who 57 developers can get an account on kernel.org, but those are not easy to come 83 that, developers cannot easily collaborate if they do not have a shared 84 view of the project history; if you rewrite history which other developers 86 for those developers. So a simple rule of thumb applies here: history 117 radar. Kernel developers tend to get unhappy when they see that kind of 146 format the request as other developers expect, and will also check to be 154 topics" on the grounds that even beginning kernel developers should be [all …]
|
D | 4.Coding.rst | 8 code. It is the code which will be examined by other developers and merged 13 number of ways in which kernel developers can go wrong. Then the focus 29 leads to two independent hazards for kernel developers. 34 the standard; many developers will request that the code be reformatted 36 requires some uniformity of code to make it possible for developers to 47 urgently in need of coding style fixes. Developers may start to generate 88 programmer's early expectation. Kernel developers will routinely submit 183 locking after the fact is a rather more difficult task. Kernel developers 230 kernel. To that end, the kernel developers have put together an impressive 281 developers and users) in a deployed system; lockdep allows them to be found [all …]
|
D | researcher-guidelines.rst | 35 on developers must be distinctly opt-in. 43 explicit agreement of, and full disclosure to, the individual developers 44 involved. Developers cannot be interacted with/experimented on without 47 To help clarify: sending patches to developers *is* interacting 74 below) and follow up on any feedback from other developers. 77 contain at least the following details, so that developers have 137 resulting patches, and there by reduces the burden on other developers.
|
D | embargoed-hardware-issues.rst | 98 The hardware security team identifies the developers (domain experts) who 100 response team can bring in further developers (domain experts) to address 103 All involved developers pledge to adhere to the embargo rules and to keep 138 developers (domain experts) who should be informed initially about the 139 issue after confirming with the developers that they will adhere to this 140 Memorandum of Understanding and the documented process. These developers 146 While individual developers might be covered by a non-disclosure agreement 148 in their role as Linux kernel developers. They will, however, agree to 189 developers via a secure connection. The repository contains the main 225 the involved developers and response teams as the patches need to be kept
|
D | 6.Followthrough.rst | 9 developers can make is to conclude that their work is now done. In truth, 26 developers as they review the code. Working with reviewers can be, for 27 many developers, the most intimidating part of the kernel development 48 agendas at the expense of your own. Kernel developers often expect to 121 patch. Now other developers working with that tree will get the patch by 132 developers and, possibly, moving some patches between trees to ensure that 145 may be a new round of comments from developers who had not been aware of 148 though; you still need to be responsive to developers who have questions or 179 development community remembers developers who lose interest in their code
|
D | stable-api-nonsense.rst | 109 stopping to slow down. As such, the kernel developers find bugs in 133 provides the ability for new developers to accidentally use the old 137 In both of these instances, all developers agreed that these were 142 to extra work for the USB developers. Since all Linux USB developers do 185 - Other developers will add features to your driver.
|
D | maintainer-pgp-guide.rst | 9 This document is aimed at Linux kernel developers, and especially at 22 communication channels between developers via PGP-signed email exchange. 30 developers who create official kernel releases. These signatures offer a 32 kernel.org or any other mirrors are identical to what these developers 40 Trusting the developers, not infrastructure 47 that trust must always be placed with developers and never with the code 52 want to make sure that by placing trust into developers we do not simply 54 The goal is to provide a set of guidelines developers can use to create 239 The more signatures you have on your PGP key from other developers, the 455 …r a free Nitrokey Start`: https://www.kernel.org/nitrokey-digital-tokens-for-kernel-developers.html [all …]
|
D | 5.Posting.rst | 25 that interested developers can catch up with your work at any time. 81 up patches is a bit of an art; some developers spend a long time figuring 88 split apart in ways which make sense. The developers are interested in 109 result is a broken kernel, you will make life harder for developers and 182 changed, detail those changes and how other developers should respond. In 233 - Co-developed-by: states that the patch was co-created by several developers; 301 - Other developers who have been working in the same area - especially
|
D | handling-regressions.rst | 8 Linux kernel development" means in practice for developers. It complements 53 All the details on Linux kernel regressions relevant for developers 128 tools and scripts used by other kernel developers or Linux distributions; one of 137 running into the issue; nevertheless developers need to take enough time and 140 In the end though, developers should give their best to prevent users from 158 * Developers should handle regressions in all supported kernel series, but are 216 More aspects regarding regressions developers should be aware of argument 225 developers or projects likely to be affected to evaluate or even test the 290 reporters and developers. In fact, only reporters are burdened with an extra 295 For developers there normally is no extra work involved, they just need to make [all …]
|
/Linux-v6.1/Documentation/ABI/testing/ |
D | sysfs-devices-xenbus | 3 Contact: Xen Developers mailing list <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org> 10 Contact: Xen Developers mailing list <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org> 17 Contact: Xen Developers mailing list <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org> 26 Contact: Xen Developers mailing list <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org> 34 Contact: Xen Developers mailing list <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
|
/Linux-v6.1/Documentation/admin-guide/ |
D | reporting-issues.rst | 22 issue. Check the :ref:`MAINTAINERS <maintainers>` file for how its developers 55 developers. It might be all that's needed for people already familiar with 98 needs to get reported to the kernel developers separately, unless they are 106 Find out how and where its developers expect reports. Note: most of the 174 switch from 5.9.15 to 5.10.5 does not qualify). The developers want to fix such 178 * Check if the kernel developers still maintain the Linux kernel version 247 * The Linux kernel developers are well aware this process is complicated and 254 request fixes from developers in the upstream Linux kernel community: such 272 issues to the Linux kernel developers. 284 Like most programmers, Linux kernel developers don't like to spend time dealing [all …]
|
D | reporting-regressions.rst | 13 for kernel developers are left to Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst. 51 it happens by accident, developers that caused it are expected to quickly fix 63 Note the "practical use case" in the first sentence of this section: developers 144 Developers of the affected code area should try to locate the culprit on their 150 run additional tests afterwards to pinpoint the exact root cause. Developers 180 something might break. This is in the interest of the kernel developers to make 186 Additionally, the kernel developers want to make it simple and appealing for 198 Exceptions to this rule are extremely rare; in the past developers almost always 220 Developers should fix any reported regression as quickly as possible, to provide 222 running into the issue; nevertheless developers need to take enough time and [all …]
|
/Linux-v6.1/Documentation/core-api/ |
D | asm-annotations.rst | 16 Nevertheless, assemblers provide developers with such annotations to aid 17 debuggers throughout assembly. On top of that, developers also want to mark 23 developers have been using ``ENTRY``, ``END``, ``ENDPROC``, and other 93 this code needs hints like ``UNWIND_HINT_REGS`` provided by developers. 113 for special cases where developers do not want this implicit alignment. 124 So in most cases, developers should write something like in the following 206 ``SYM_END``, or ``SYM_ENTRY`` at last. Normally, developers should avoid using
|
/Linux-v6.1/Documentation/doc-guide/ |
D | contributing.rst | 7 Good documentation helps to bring new developers in and helps established 8 developers work more effectively. Without top-quality documentation, a lot 16 Kernel documentation improvements can be made by developers at a variety of 138 from the documentation build, then we can start expecting developers to 144 Developers are encouraged to write kerneldoc comments for their code, but 158 specifically aimed at developers working within the relevant subsystem. 204 the cooperation of developers familiar with the subsystem in question, of 205 course. Developers are often more than willing to cooperate with people 296 developers and users will thank you.
|
/Linux-v6.1/Documentation/ABI/ |
D | README | 30 these interfaces, so that the kernel developers can easily 53 the "testing" stage, so that kernel developers can work 54 with userspace developers to ensure that things do not 78 developers feel they are finished. They cannot be removed from the
|
/Linux-v6.1/fs/btrfs/ |
D | Kconfig | 77 developers. 96 any of the assertions trip. This is meant for btrfs developers only. 106 is meant to be used by btrfs developers for tracking down extent
|
/Linux-v6.1/Documentation/ |
D | index.rst | 34 Manuals for use by developers working to interface with the rest of the 48 Various other manuals with useful information for all kernel developers. 69 developers seeking information on the kernel's user-space APIs.
|
/Linux-v6.1/Documentation/maintainer/ |
D | rebasing-and-merging.rst | 45 There are a few rules of thumb that can help developers to avoid the worst 56 developers know not to base work on them. Developers will sometimes 172 resolution - often better than the developers involved. 224 should not prevent developers from doing the right thing when the need
|
/Linux-v6.1/Documentation/riscv/ |
D | patch-acceptance.rst | 3 arch/riscv maintenance guidelines for developers 23 "Frozen" or "Ratified" by the RISC-V Foundation. (Developers may, of
|
/Linux-v6.1/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ |
D | selection-api-configuration.rst | 32 target. It is recommended for the driver developers to put the top/left 117 the driver developers to put the top/left corner at position ``(0,0)``. 124 this document. Driver developers are encouraged to keep padded rectangle
|