Lines Matching full:comments
59 * detail in the comments on the function
207 * Time limit for merging (see comments in bfq_setup_cooperator). Set
272 * for interactive queues automatically (see the comments at the
280 * applications on the reference device (see the comments on
362 * described at the beginning of these comments.
778 * comments on the likely() at the beginning of
799 * bfqq cannot be merged any longer (see comments in in bfq_pos_tree_add_move()
829 * temporarily empty (for more details, see the comments in the
970 * See the comments to the function bfq_weights_tree_add() for considerations
1206 /* Empty burst list and add just bfqq (see comments on bfq_handle_burst) */
1217 * active queue. See comments on the conditional invocation of in bfq_reset_burst_list()
1728 * completed (see the comments to the in bfq_update_bfqq_wr_on_rq_arrival()
1828 * See the comments on in bfq_bfqq_handle_idle_busy_switch()
1936 * recover a service hole, as explained in the comments on in bfq_bfqq_handle_idle_busy_switch()
1962 * comments on bfq_bfqq_update_budg_for_activation()). in bfq_bfqq_handle_idle_busy_switch()
2021 * throughput, as explained in detail in the comments in in bfq_reset_inject_limit()
2033 * times and update the inject limit accordingly (see comments in bfq_reset_inject_limit()
2096 * aspect, see the comments on the choice of the queue for injection
2121 * (see the comments in bfq_update_inject_limit()). So, thanks to
2227 * changes, see step (3) in the comments on in bfq_add_request()
2305 * See comments on bfq_pos_tree_add_move() for the unlikely(). in bfq_add_request()
2435 /* see comments on bfq_pos_tree_add_move() for the unlikely() */ in bfq_remove_request()
2537 * See comments on bfq_pos_tree_add_move() for in bfq_request_merged()
3111 * empty (see comments in __bfq_bfqq_expire() for in bfq_release_process_ref()
3420 * function of the estimated peak rate. See comments on
3455 * For the convergence property to hold (see comments on in bfq_update_rate_reset()
3546 * the minimum representable values reported in the comments in bfq_update_rate_reset()
3782 * request of Q arrives soon (see the comments on
3786 * comments on function bfq_bfqq_update_budg_for_activation,
3823 * non-weight-raised queues, for efficiency reasons (see comments on
3934 * See comments on bfq_pos_tree_add_move() for the unlikely(). in __bfq_bfqq_expire()
3958 * See the body for detailed comments.
4015 * comments to the BUDGET_TIMEOUT case. in __bfq_bfqq_recalc_budget()
4054 * comments in the body of in __bfq_bfqq_recalc_budget()
4125 * their chances to lower the throughput. More details in the comments
4128 * An important observation is in order: as discussed in the comments
4380 * (see the comments on the function in bfq_bfqq_expire()
4635 * See the comments on the function bfq_better_to_idle for the reasons
4648 * comments on bfq_update_inject_limit() for details on the injection
4766 * actuator is below the threshold (see comments on
4768 * next actuator (comments on this extra condition below), and there
4816 * prevent bfqq from expiring is the same as in the comments in bfq_select_queue()
5083 /* see comments on max_service_from_wr */ in bfq_update_wr_data()
5093 * comments on the function). in bfq_update_wr_data()
5357 * burst, see comments on bfq_handle_burst). in bfq_put_queue()
5370 * (see comments on the case of a split in in bfq_put_queue()
5648 * comments on bfq_bfqq_softrt_next_start). Set in bfq_init_bfqq()
5988 * short or long (details in the comments in in bfq_update_has_short_ttime()
6002 * to receive new I/O. Details in the comments on the choice in bfq_update_has_short_ttime()
6005 * As stressed in those comments, if such a synchronization is in bfq_update_has_short_ttime()
6043 * (as explained in the comments in in bfq_update_has_short_ttime()
6055 * waker queue is defined in the comments in in bfq_update_has_short_ttime()
6423 * comments on the function bfq_bfqq_softrt_next_start()). We in bfq_completed_request()
6425 * weight raising (see the comments in bfq_bfqq_expire() for in bfq_completed_request()
6578 * More details on each step are provided in the comments on the
6582 * bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection(). These comments also explain some
6777 * (see comments in in bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split()
6807 * comments on bfq_init_rq for the reason behind this delayed
6957 * therefore in not weight-raising bfqq. See comments on in bfq_init_rq()
6965 * comments on bfq_handle_burst() for further details also on in bfq_init_rq()
7083 * See the comments on bfq_limit_depth for the purpose of
7329 /* see comments on the definition of next field inside bfq_data */ in bfq_init_queue()
7644 * comments before the definition of the next in bfq_init()